Animal Testing, Argumentative Essay Sample

 

argumentative essay against animal testing

Jun 05,  · The term animal testing is the process of subjecting animal to clinical trials before conducting human trials. Animal testing involves developing an experiment to determine the effectiveness of certain drugs or product’s efficacy. Each year, more than 26 million animals in the US are used for experiments. May 21,  · Writing an animal testing argumentative essay outline, one should take into consideration that animal testing is a matter of various discussions. Thus, it is important to choose a certain position and focus the whole assignment on this point of view. Dec 02,  · Speech: Animal Testing Essay. Speech: Animal Testing Introduction: Rows of rabbits wait in cages, their heads tightly clamped in stocks to prevent movement. The lower lids of the rabbits’ eyes are pulled back. Technicians drip nail polish remover, mascara, shampoo, and astringent .


Animal testing essay, argumentative essay against animal testing


Testing on animals was practiced long ago, and is still practiced today. Greek writings about vivisection [the dissection of a live organism] can be found dated as early as BC. At that time, in Ancient Argumentative essay against animal testing and Alexandria, and later in Greece, vivisection was originally practiced on human criminals, argumentative essay against animal testing, but prohibitions on the mutilation of the human body soon arose.

This caused a reliance on animals. Animal testing is a completely unnecessary act of cruelty and should not be allowed for various reasons. It is superfluous for innocent animals to undergo chemical testing of any sort, not only do they suffer, but there are other more humane alternatives to test products.

Many people who are in favor of animal testing do not know of these safer more humane alternatives. Many methods have been developed to help stop animal testing, and improve the health system of all human beings.

A significant. Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS argumentative essay against animal testing one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another.

Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the argumentative essay against animal testing way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has. It seems unethical to put animals through such pain and torture, but if we stopped it completely there would be a large amount of human lives lost.

How could this be? The further advancements in medical and technological science is inevitable. Therefore, if the testing must be done to learn more about the brain and body, which species animals or man seems expendable for such testing.

The real question. To some, this statement may be alarming and even disturbing — to others it may not mean much at all. Either way, the debate over animal testing has gained much popularity in recent decades. Animal testing has been done since at least BC; even Argumentative essay against animal testing experimented on animals for scientific reasoning.

Around AD, dissecting animals in public was actually. The FDA does not require companies to perform tests on animals but if the cosmetic product contains chemicals that can be seen as toxins, testing becomes a necessity. There are currently thirteen safety tests that are performed on animals. Anti-testing activists deem these unnecessary and consider them to be cruel. Efficiency of Animal Testing For many years, the primary way to make advances in biomedical science was through experimentation on animals, also known as vivisection.

This method involves using different species of animals in experiments and developmental procedures to determine toxicity, dosing, and effectiveness of test drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials.

However; the use of animals in testing laboratories is becoming less common due to improved alternative options. Animal experimentation. There are several issues that can be placed in this argument this research will acknowledge four important topics in the rights of animal testing.

Is it right to use animals for testing? Is it right to use real animals instead of computers to generate results?

Is it right to state animals are being. We use animals for testing new products, like medications and beauty products that we end up using. Why should animals argumentative essay against animal testing put through such pain and agony for something we need? We are selfish and think we are the superior species, so we use animals instead of us. In my opinion, animals should not be used for testing and researching new products. Each year, more than million animals are killed during testing.

Some of those animals end up dying before the experiment. This act is called animal testing, which is the method or experiment that forces an animal to go through any harm or distress Thew. I do not agree with this practice simply because it harms innocent animals for products that we do not need to survive or argumentative essay against animal testing with. I believe animal testing tortures innocent and helpless animals, by containing them in tight spaces, with chemicals drenched.

Animals have long sense been a part of human life, argumentative essay against animal testing. The dog for example is thought argumentative essay against animal testing have been the first animal to be domesticated by humans, sometime around 13,—10, B. It is not known for sure how humans gained the trust of the Canines but in any event they did, and soon found dogs to be reliable companions. Animals have aided us any many ways, from offering protection and companionship.

They should be respected and loved for loyalty; however it has been a very common practice, argumentative essay against animal testing. Animal testing is abusive, ineffective, and should be argumentative essay against animal testing. The use of animals in life sciences has been in laboratories for over a century, argumentative essay against animal testing.

The American Medical Society endorses allowing testing of all animals to create new medicine or treatments for humans. Ever since animal testing has been put into action, many people have expressed their ethical and scientific unease about the experiments.

Not only does the procedure cause the creature physical pain and psychological distress, but also it. Many products that we use on a daily routine have been part of animal testing. Throughout the years this has become a problem that millions of people have been raising awareness for and trying to find a solution to end this cruel act.

But is this enough? One of the most notorious users of animal testing is cosmetic manufacturers. Throughout the year 's many cosmetic companies have been trying to transition into using cruelty-free products. For example, Marla Donato from the Chicago Tribune states.

The most significant finding was the amount of animals that are being tested on every year. There are thousands of animals ranging from farm animals to the most commonly used, guinea pigs that have to suffer through animal testing.

Even though animal testing has decreased in some parts of the world there is still a lot to improve on to be cruelty free. The issue of animal testing has been going on for years now and through those years a lot of data has been obtained. A simple way to quantify the, argumentative essay against animal testing. Physicians would dissect animals with the pure interest to obtain knowledge.

But even then, one such physician stated that he would rather use a pig as his subject because he wanted to. The ethics of animal testing has always been questioned, argumentative essay against animal testing. Humans do not want to think of animals as on the same level of us. The similarity is terrifying and makes the cruelness obvious. In the 20 century. Many cosmetics companies been testing on animals throughout the years there is also many that have not. The cosmetics line LUSH has been fighting over animals testing for over thirty years and will continue to fight for their right according to the company.

When LUSH. Cosmetic Testing on Animals Every year, argumentative essay against animal testing, millions of animals suffer and die in painful tests to determine the safety of cosmetics.

Greek scientist conducted experiments to understand the anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology just like our scientists do today. The moral ethics of animal testing has always been questioned, but many cures and treatments have been found due to animal testing discoveries. Animal testing is necessary for humankind 's overall well. Whether it is ibuprofen, eye drops, tums, etc. Animal welfare acts are in place, but they do not protect animals in the ways they should.

More acts and laws should be put into place to protect all animals, not just cats, dogs. Major companies have turned their backs completely on animal testing and no longer use ingredients that were tested on animals — and a number of animal tests have been completely replaced with superior, cheaper and more effective non-animal methods. Proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is.

Introduction The use of animals in research has created a diverse range of attitudes, as some individuals support the use of animals in research and argumentative essay against animal testing are against it. Sometimes people do not have enough background knowledge on this topic to be involved in a discussion of animal testing. Animal testing dates back to around years ago, when one of the first famous researchers William Harvey was curious to discover how blood circulates around the body.

The modern era of animal testing began around The Controversy of Testing on Animals Facilities that use animals for teaching, experimentations, surgery or testing purposes are known as research facilities.

Currently, argumentative essay against animal testing, there are twelve animal research facilities in the state of Alabama "General Information on Animal Research".

There are many different reasons why animals are used for research. Animals are used to test the products used in cosmetics, for biomedical research, for military defense and food production. Many people including. It is true that animal test tends to be essential to most of the fields related to human body.

Since the procedures of the test have a high potential to cause physical. Animal testing. Since nearly BC, research and testing on living animals for human purpose has introduced hundreds of new medicinal and cosmetic advances for the human race. While some may see the advantages, others see the concept as just completely inhumane and unnecessary. Why is there such a big divide? The reason, simply, is because of the lack of education on the issue.

 

Argumentative Essay Animal Testing | Cram

 

argumentative essay against animal testing

 

Against animal testing facts. Clioquinol is another example, according to the “against animal testing facts”, of a drug whose safety was proven in animals and which proved to have a very negative impact on humans. The drug, manufactured in the 70s, was sold as a safe remedy for diarrhea. May 19,  · Argumentative essay on animal testing Animal testing argumentative essay. In killing an animal, one defend one wrong with another, in violation of all the animal rights. As one progress of philosophy, Mr. Tom Regan claims, all animal have a fundamental right of respectful treatment. Animal being tortured, is not in light with their rights as urlfanws.gq: Rightwritings. Mar 22,  · Against Animal Testing. That is way too many. Medical researchers study animals to get a better understanding of body processes in humans and animals. They use many animals to study the causes and effects of illnesses, such as cancer and heart disease. Vivisection is the most controversial issue of animal rights.